Before I put on my feminist glasses let me briefly tell you how did I like Fashion. Well though it was definitely below the expectation, I won’t say it was bad. Spending Rs.115 on a Saturday morning was worth  only for all the eye candy the film has to offer, both to hetro and homo eyes. Kangana Ranaut stole my heart. Every time she walked the ramp I was being transported to a world of ecstasy. There was so much that she conveyed merely by the way she looked at the camera and the way she moved. You could see a super charged life which had so much in it, success, pride, arrogance, pain, loneliness, helplessness and a hidden innocence.

Then comes the wardrobe malfunction scene and I don’t have enough words in praise of her performance in that. A bare naked soul standing there on the ramp embarrassed and shattered, she can’t run, can’t hide, can’t even close her eyes when a zillion cameras are flashing at her. Respect to Kangana for this scene.

This was also Priyanka Chopra’s best performance, she have sincerely worked hard for this role and that shows. I would give it to her just for the hard work. Kitu Gidwani gave another powerhouse performance. I love that woman so much but we never see enough of her in Bollywood. I am not sure if she is more active in the theater circle or any other film industry.

Amongst the powerhouse performances by the ladies one man stands out and he is Harsh Chaya playing a gay designer who is the ultimate name amongst Bollywood designers. His limp hands, lisp tongue was all so perfectly done.

BUT besides a few good performances, the film fails on many count. It was too long and slow. There were so many scenes which didn’t fit in and I was like, “why did we need this scene in the plot“.  At one point I was literally crying out loud for the ‘The End’ board.

A complex subject handled realistically making an eye opener film – That’s how Madhur Bhandarkar films are usually described. But ‘Fashion’ was neither so complex nor an eye opener (which I’ll tell you how a few para later).

The story is simple. Meghna (Priyanka Chopra) a small town girl from Chandigarh dreams to make it big in the modeling industry. She moves to Mumbai to try her luck. Success comes easily to her, after a few rounds of auditions and a photo shoot, she becomes a super model, then success gets on her head and she becomes everything she never thought she’d be. Because of her arrogance and unprofessionalism she falls off the ladder. Will she rise again? (That’s it no spoilers here)

It’s simple and predictable. There was nothing in the film that I didn’t already know or that came as a shock to me. In fact there were a lot of annoying cliches. [And here is where I wear my feminist glasses]

Dude, you are making this movie in 2008. Over the last 10 years of fashion boom in India we have seen them all, the Milind Somans and the Madhu Sapres, the Arjun Rampals and the Meher Jessias, the Rohit Bals Karan Johars. We know its a tough world, we read their interviews, we read their life stories. So please get real, any girl who wants to be a super model today wouldn’t be so shocked to know that there is a ‘no marriage and no pregnancy clause’ in her contract. I mean c’mon, we know that since the Nutan and Suraiya days (and that’s like 60 years) that pregnant and married woman are a big no no in the media or film industry.

In any case why would a smart professional be stupid enough to even get pregnant? Whatever happened to the condoms and the I-pills. Why would she do it to her career? “Main tumhaare bacche ki maa ban ne wali hun.” So cliched. Mr. Bhandarkar really needs to meet the true professional women who would never be so stupid, and even if it happened accidentally, she wouldn’t even bother to tell the man anything and would simply get it aborted. And why would the man pay the abortion bills? Aargh. It’s time for Mr. Bhandarkar to open up, get real and learn that a ‘Sonali Roy’ of ‘Aitraaz‘ is the kind of professionals that we have out there in plenty in the real industry and his Meghna was anything but real.

Looking through my feminist glasses, there is this one major problem with most Bhandarkar films. He breaks the stereo-type, but very cleverly remains within a framework that proclaims that such non-stereotypes are not the right thing to be. In ‘Fashion’ his‘Meghna’ is this ‘good’ girl in a bad world. So even if she is unconventional enough to have an one night stand with a random guy after getting drunk, her world comes crashing down when she gets sober. Oh c’mon, so she had a one night stand, big deal. Who doesn’t. What was the drama all about? But hey, she is supposed to be a ‘good’ girl and ‘good’ girls don’t have one night stands, and if they do, they must repent. Like I said, Mr. Bhandarkar has no idea.

Good girls always want to get pregnant because motherhood is the ultimate goal they have in life and they don’t give a damn about their career when its pitted against her eternal role as a mother. So, his ‘Meghna‘ like a good girl attempted to gain motherhood. But its a bad world, her man was a jerk and her contract didn’t allow her to get pregnant so she had to go for an abortion. Till this point it’s not stereotype. But the way she handles an abortion was so cliched. Like the abortion was the end of the world, like it was the best thing that could have ever happened to her and now it is lost. Sadly, Mr. Bhandarkar has no idea how easy it could be for some women to get a pregnancy terminated without any qualms because it didn’t suit their scheme of things. But good girls must not be ok with it. They must not feel right about abortion, they must feel having sinned, they must repent to the point of insanity. No, Mr. Bhandarkar, it isn’t like that, its my body, my choice and if my circumstances don’t suit me I would happily decide against it.

Again in Corporate it was so cliched the way Nishigandha Dasgupta (aka Nishi played by Bipasha Basu) fell into a trap and rotted for the rest of her life. Did he mean to say she was that stupid? She thought she could make a mark in the corporate world by agreeing to take responsibility of a crime to save her husband and his family? I can’t believe Mr. Bhandarkar got away with falsely claiming Corporate to be a film on women’s liberation, because it so was NOT. It was just a corporatized version of a sati savitri who would take any shit in the world to save her husband and his honour because that’s what good wives should do. An ambitious woman wouldn’t jeopardize her whole life for the sake of family and honour but then she wouldn’t be known as a good wife.

Problem is he makes films behind its time. Today India has one of the top notch businesspersons, entrepreneurs, managers who are women. Gender biases are being done away with in most corporates, following the historic Vishakha Judgment today most respectable firms have a ‘prevention of sexual harassment’ cell in place. Today we have a Chanda Kocchar of ICICI Bank who came at No.37 in list of world’s most powerful businesswomen, we have Naina Lal Kidwai who has been listed among the World’s Top 50 Corporate Women from 2000 to 2003 by Fortune Magazine, we have Latika Thukral, CitiBank’s business head, we have Sulajja Firodia Motwani, Joint Managing Director of Kinetic Engineering Ltd. We have ICICI bank which built its business by hiring smart women managers and creating a female-friendly environment. The list is endless. Indian women have come so far and yet all Mr. Bhandarkar could think of was a dumb good girl succumbing to the bad world.

Fashion is largely dominated by female actors. The natural expectation was to see many more progressive and non-stereotype scenes from a feminist point of view. But there weren’t many. First of, there weren’t many female designers. All designers throughout the film were Gay. Ok, we know we have gay fashion designers but showing 8 of them in one film was a bit too much. You have all kind of gays in Fashion, the funny ones, the smart ones, the ones with limp hands, ones with no limp hands, the committed ones, the forever-eyeing-cute-guy ones.

You show a couple of strong gay characters with enough depth and complexity, and I would say you handled homosexuality with maturity and respect, you show too many of them, none leaving a significant impact on the audience and it feels like you are mocking them. Like I said, he’ll break the stereo types but not really break it. Also, there are no lesbians in Mr. Bhandarkar’s understanding of the Fashion world because that would have been too much of a risk taking with the moral police. And there are no strong willed gay ready to take the heterosexual norms head on.

Another thing that he gets away with every time is the claim to have made eye opening movies. In all his films he really shows things that we already knew. It’s like Bhandarkar telling us, “all you sorry people who live in Yash Chopras’ dream land and know nothing of the real world, come to me I will show you how things in real world are.” And then I go, “but dude this much I knew, I read papers you know, I know what goes around in the world.” and he is like, “Oh no you know but you don’t know how it happens, so now I show you how it happens.” But I know. Ok whatever.

I knew it when I was probably 15 that there are these cruel kidnappers who steal new born kids and put them in earthen pots and leave them like that so that they’d grow up to have a deformed body and then make them beggars. That begging is no less an organised business with a proper structure complete with agents and sub agents was shown in the film ‘Gardish’ some 15 years back. Time and again each one of us have been conned by a decent guy whose wallet got stolen and he had no money to go back home or an innocent mother who was going to medical shop for buying medicines for her ailing son and on the way she lost her purse. I have myself been conned like that, so what new did you see in Traffic Signal?

I was in my school final days when my parents told me, “my child, don’t dream of working in these big companies, those are not for middle class people like us, you need to be beautiful and smart to get a job there, for people like us, best is a Government job.” And so I was advised to prepare for IAS, SSC and UPSC exams. So how was Corporate offering anything new?

The same was told to me when I wanted to study ‘Film Direction and Scripting’. Film industry media industry are not places for good middle class girls. We know there is a casting couch, we know people do drugs, we know people have extra marital affairs: dude all that we know. Thanks to so many news channels and the page 3s we know exactly what shit is happening in these glamor industries. So what good are these so called “realistic thought provoking” films doing in order to make a change.

It would have made me much happy if the woman protagonist in Corporate did win in the end or if the gay couple in Fashion could finally assert their sexuality instead of succumbing to the constant pressure of a heterosexual marriage. Showing a change on reel might bring a change in real. Showing the already depressing shit and how it wins over dreams and ambition would further perpetuate the moral police telling us “corporates and fashion industry are not the places for us to be, its a bad place.”

Think responsibly Mr. Bhandarkar.

[Crossposted on Mutiny]